What Is Mental Health?

Emotional wellness joins our enthusiastic, mental, and social wealth. It influences how we think, feel, and act. It likewise chooses how we handle weight, identify with others, and relax on decisions. Emotional well-being is important at each phase of life, from childhood and pre-adulthood through maturity.

Through your life, on the off chance that you knowledge psychological well-being issues, you’re cognitive, state of mind, and conduct could be influenced. Numerous variables add to psychological well-being issues, including:

Organic variables, for example, qualities or mind science

Beneficial encounters, like injury or misuse

Family background of emotional wellness issues

Emotional wellness issues are usual however help is nearby. Individuals with emotional well-being issues can improve and many recuperate totally.

Early Warning Signs

Not certain on the off chance that you or somebody you know is living with psychological wellness issues? Meeting at least one of the accompanying opinions or practices can be an early caution indication of an subject:

Eating or resting excessively or excessively little
Pulling away from individuals and regular exercises
Having low or no energy
Feeling numb or like nothing matters
Having unexplained a throbbing painfulness
Feeling vulnerable or miserable
Smoking, drinking, or utilizing drugs more than expected

Feeling abnormally confounded, careless, anxious, furious, steamed, stressed, or frightened

Hollering or battling with loved ones

Encountering serious emotional episodes that mess up connections

Having persevering musings and recollections you can't escape your head

Hearing voices or accepting false things

Considering hurting yourself or others

Powerlessness to perform everyday undertakings like dealing with your children or having the chance to work or school

Get familiar with explicit emotional wellness issues and where to discover help.
Emotional well-being and Wellness
Positive psychological wellness permits individuals to:
Understand their maximum capacity
Adapt to the burdens of life
Work gainfully
Make significant commitments to their networks
Approaches to keep up sure emotional well-being include:
Getting capable assistance on the occasion that you need it
Associating with others
Remaining positive
Getting genuinely dynamic
Helping other people
Getting sufficient rest
Creating adapting abilities
Prosperity Concepts

Prosperity is a positive result that is significant for individuals and for some areas of society since it reveals to us that individuals see that their lives are working out in a good way. Great everyday environments (e.g., lodging, business) are essential to prosperity. Following these conditions is significant for public arrangements. Notwithstanding, numerous markers that action day-to-day environments neglect to quantify people's opinions and feelings about their lives, like the nature of their connections, their good feelings, flexibility, the acknowledgment of their latent capacity, or their general fulfillment with life—i.e., their "prosperity." Well-being for the most part incorporates worldwide decisions of life fulfillment and sentiments going from sorrow to delight.

Why is prosperity valuable for general well-being?

Prosperity coordinates emotional well-being (mind) and actual well-being (body) bringing about more all-encompassing ways to deal with infection counteraction and well-being advancement.
Prosperity is a substantial populace result measure past dreariness, mortality, and financial status that discloses to us how individuals see their life going from their own point of view.
Prosperity is a result that is significant to people in general.
Advances in brain science, neuroscience, and estimation hypothesis recommend that prosperity can be estimated with some level of exactness.
Results from cross-sectional, longitudinal, and trial examine track down that prosperity is related with
Self-saw wellbeing.
Life span
Sound practices.
Mental and actual ailment.
Social connectedness.
Usefulness.
Elements in the physical and social climate.
Prosperity can give a typical metric that can help strategy producers shape and look at the impacts of various arrangements (e.g., loss of greenspace may affect prosperity more so than business improvement of a space).
Estimating, following, and advancing prosperity can be helpful for different partners engaged with sickness counteraction and well-being advancement.
Prosperity is related to various well-being, work, family-, and financially related advantages. For instance, more elevated levels of prosperity are related to diminished danger of sickness, ailment, and injury; better resistant working; speedier recuperation; and expanded life span. People with significant degrees of prosperity are more useful at work and are bound to add to their networks.
Past research loans backing to the view that the negative influence part of prosperity is firmly connected with neuroticism and that the positive influence segment has a comparative relationship with extraversion. This exploration additionally upholds the view that positive feelings—focal parts of prosperity—are not simply something contrary to negative feelings, yet are free elements of emotional wellness that can and ought to be encouraged. Albeit a significant extent of the difference in prosperity can be credited to heritable elements, natural components play similar if not a more significant job.

How does prosperity identify with well-being advancement?

Well-being is more than the shortfall of illness; it's anything but an asset that permits individuals to understand their yearnings, fulfill their necessities, and adapt to the climate to live a long, useful, and productive life. In this sense, well-being empowers social, financial, and self-awareness major to prosperity. Well-being advancement is the way toward empowering individuals to expand power over and improve their well-being. Natural and social assets for well-being can include harmony, financial security, a steady biological system, and safe housing.30 Individual assets for well-being can include actual work, energizing eating routine, social ties, versatility, positive feelings, and self-governance. Wellbeing advancement exercises pointed toward reinforcing such individual, natural and social assets may, at last, improve prosperity.

How is prosperity characterized?

There is no agreement around a solitary meaning of prosperity, yet there is a general arrangement that at least, prosperity incorporates the presence of good feelings and temperaments (e.g., satisfaction, bliss), the shortfall of negative feelings (e.g., sadness, uneasiness), fulfillment with life, satisfaction and good functioning. In basic terms, prosperity can be depicted as making a decision about existence decidedly and feeling good For general well-being purposes, actual prosperity (e.g., feeling amazing and ready for business) is additionally seen as basic to by and large prosperity. Analysts from various orders have analyzed various parts of prosperity that incorporate the accompanying

Actual prosperity.
Monetary prosperity.
Social prosperity.
Improvement and action.
Enthusiastic prosperity.
Mental prosperity.
Life fulfillment.
Area explicit fulfillment.
Drawing in exercises and work.

How is prosperity estimated?

Since prosperity is abstract, it is commonly estimated with self-reports. The utilization of self-announced measures is generally unique to utilizing target measures (e.g., family pay, joblessness levels, neighborhood wrongdoing) regularly used to survey prosperity. The utilization of both unbiased and emotional measures, when accessible, is attractive for public arrangement purposes.

There are some prosperity instruments accessible that action unexpectedly self-revealed prosperity, contingent upon whether one estimates prosperity as a clinical result, a populace well-being result, for cost-adequacy considerations, or for different purposes. For instance, prosperity measures can be psychometrically based or utility-based. Psychometrically put together measures are based on the connection between, and strength among, numerous things that are proposed to quantify at least one area of prosperity. Utility-put-together measures are based on an individual or gathering's inclination for a specific state and are regularly secured between 0 (passing) to 1 (ideal well-being). A few investigations support the utilization of single things (e.g., worldwide life fulfillment) to quantify prosperity tightfisted. Friend reports, observational techniques, physiological strategies, experience examining techniques, natural transitory appraisal, and different strategies are utilized by therapists to quantify various parts of prosperity.

Throughout the long term, for general well-being reconnaissance purposes, CDC has estimated prosperity with various instruments including some that are psychometrically based, utility-based, or with single things:

What are a few discoveries from these investigations?

Information from the NHANES I (1971–1975), tracked down that utilized ladies had a higher feeling of prosperity and utilized fewer expert administrations to adapt to individual and psychological well-being issues than their nonemployee counterparts.

Information from the 2001 NHIS and Quality of Well-Being scale, an inclination-based scale which scores prosperity between 0-1, discovered that guys or females between the ages of 20–39 had altogether better prosperity (scores ≥ 0.82) contrasted and guys or females 40 years old or more seasoned (scores >0.79).54

Information from the 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System tracked down that 5.6% of US grown-ups (around 12 million) revealed that they were disappointed/extremely disappointed with their lives.

Information from the 2005 BRFSS tracked down that about 8.6% of grown-ups announced that they seldom/never got social and passionate help; going in esteem from 4.2% in Minnesota to 12.4% in the US Virgin Islands.47

In light of 2008 Porter Novelli Health Styles data.55
11% of grown-ups felt happy the entirety of the time in the previous 30 days.
15% of grown-ups felt quiet and serene the entirety of the time in the previous 30 days.
13% of grown-ups felt brimming with life the entirety of the time in the previous 30 days.
9.8% of grown-ups unequivocally concur that their life is near their great.
19% of grown-ups str

What are a few related determinants of individual-level prosperity?

There is no sole determinant of individual prosperity, however by and large, prosperity is subject to acceptable well-being, positive social connections, and accessibility and admittance to essential assets (e.g., cover, pay).

Various investigations have analyzed the relationship between determinants of individual and public degrees of prosperity. A considerable lot of these examinations have utilized various proportions of prosperity (e.g., life fulfillment, positive effect, mental prosperity), and various philosophies bringing about incidental conflicting discoveries identified with prosperity and its indicators. When all is said in done, life fulfillment is reliant all the more intently on the accessibility of fundamental necessities being met (food, cover, pay) just as admittance to present-day accommodations (e.g., power). Wonderful feelings are all the more firmly connected with having strong relationships.5

Some broad discoveries on the relationship between prosperity and its relationship with different variables are as per the following:

Qualities and Personality

At the individual level, hereditary variables, character, and segment factors are identified with prosperity. For instance, positive feelings are heritable somewhat (heritability gauges range from 0.36 to 0.81), proposing that there might be a hereditarily resolved set-point for feelings like joy and pity. Nonetheless, the outflow of hereditary impacts is regularly affected by factors in the climate inferring that conditions and social conditions do matter and are significant from a public approach point of view. Longitudinal investigations have tracked down that prosperity is touchy to life occasions (e.g., joblessness, marriage). Also, hereditary factors alone can't clarify contrasts in prosperity between countries or patterns inside countries.

Some character factors that are unequivocally connected with prosperity incorporate positive thinking, extroversion, and confidence. Hereditary components and character factors are firmly related and can associate with affecting individual prosperity.

While hereditary components and character factors are significant determinants of prosperity, they are past the domain of public strategy objectives.

Age and Gender

Contingent upon which kinds of measures are utilized (e.g., life fulfillment versus positive effect), age and sex additionally have been demonstrated to be identified with prosperity. As a rule, people have comparable degrees of prosperity, yet this example changes with age and has changed over the long run. There is a U-molded dispersion of prosperity by age—more youthful and more established grown-ups will in general have all the more prosperity contrasted with moderately aged grown-ups.

Pay and Work

The connection between pay and prosperity is unpredictable. Contingent upon which sorts of measures are utilized and which examinations are made, pay connects just unobtrusively with prosperity. By and large, the relationship between pay and prosperity (generally estimated as far as life fulfillment) is more grounded for those at lower financial levels, however, concentrates additionally have discovered impacts for those at higher pay levels. Paid business is basic to the prosperity of people by giving direct admittance to assets, just as cultivating fulfillment, which means and reason for a few. Joblessness adversely influences prosperity, both in the short and long haul.

Connections

Having steady connections is perhaps the most grounded indicator of prosperity, having a quite constructive outcome.

What are a few related to prosperity at the public level?

Nations vary considerably in their degrees of prosperity. Social orders with higher prosperity are those that are all the more monetarily created, have successful governments with low degrees of debasement, have significant degrees of trust, and can meet residents' fundamental requirements for food and well-being. Social elements (e.g., independence versus community, accepted practices) additionally assume a part in public gauges of prosperity.

What is the contrast between well-being related to personal satisfaction, prosperity, thriving, positive emotional well-being, ideal well-being, bliss, abstract prosperity, mental prosperity, life fulfillment, epicurean prosperity, and different terms that exist in the writing?

A few analysts recommend that a large number of the terms are equivalent, while others note that there are significant contrasts dependent on which measurements are free and contribute most to prosperity. This is a developing science, with commitments from different orders. Customarily, well-being-related personal satisfaction has been connected to patient results, and has commonly centered around shortfalls in working (e.g., torment, pessimistic effect). Conversely, prosperity centers around resources in working, including positive feelings and mental assets (e.g., good effect, self-sufficiency, dominance) as key parts. A few specialists have attracted from the two viewpoints to quantify physical and mental prosperity for clinical and financial examinations. Emotional prosperity commonly alludes to self-reports that stood out from target pointers of prosperity. The expression, "positive emotional wellness" points out the mental parts that contain prosperity from the viewpoint of people intrigued basically by the psychological well-being space. From this point of view, positive emotional wellness is an asset, extensively comprehensive of mental resources and abilities fundamental for prosperity. In any case, the last for the most part avoids the actual segment of prosperity. "Indulgent" prosperity centers around the "feeling" part of prosperity (e.g., satisfaction) as opposed to "eudaimonia" prosperity which centers around the "thinking" segment of prosperity (e.g., satisfaction). Individuals with significant degrees of positive feelings and individuals who are working great mentally and socially are depicted by some as having total psychological well-being, or as "prospering."

In outline, positive psychological well-being, prosperity, and thriving allude to the presence of undeniable degrees of positive working—basically in the emotional well-being area (comprehensive of social wellbeing). In any case, in its broadest sense, prosperity envelops physical, mental, and social areas.

The reasons why prosperity and related developments ought to be estimated and assessing how these spaces can be changed should help advise which areas (e.g., life fulfillment, positive effect, self-rule, which means, imperativeness, torment) ought to be estimated, and which instruments and techniques to utilize.

How is CDC doing to analyze and advance prosperity?

CDC's Health-Related Quality of Life Program has driven an exertion since 2007 to inspect how prosperity can be coordinated into well-being advancement and how it very well may be estimated in general well-being observation systems.55 various investigations have analyzed the possibility of existing scales for reconnaissance, including the use of the thing reaction hypothesis to recognize brief, psychometrically strong short-form(s) that can be utilized in general well-being observation systems.72,73 CDC and three states (OR, WA, NH) gathered information utilizing the Satisfaction with Life Scale and other prosperity measures on the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.74 CDC additionally drove the improvement of overall objectives identified with personal satisfaction and prosperity for the Healthy People 2020 drive.

References:

Diener E, Seligman ME. Beyond money. Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 2004;5(1):1–31.
Diener E. Assessing well-being: the collected works of Ed Diener. New York: Springer; 2009.
Diener E, Scollon CN, Lucas RE. The evolving concept of subjective well-being: the multifaceted nature of happiness. In: E Diener (ed.) Assessing well-being: the collected works of Ed Diener. New York: Springer; 2009:67–100.
Frey BS, Stutzer A. Happiness and economics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2002.
Diener E, Lucas R, Schimmack U, and Helliwell J. Well-Being for public policy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Dunn HL. High-level wellness. R.W. Beatty, Ltd: Arlington; 1973.
Kahneman D. Objective happiness. In: D Kahneman, E Diener, and N Schwartz (eds.) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1999:3–25.
Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol Bull 2005;131(6):803–855.
Pressman SD, Cohen S. Does positive affect influence health? Psychol Bull 2005;131:925–971.
Ostir GV, Markides KS, Black SA., et al. Emotional well-being predicts subsequent functional independence and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:473–478.
Ostir GV, Markides KS, Peek MK, et al. The association between emotional well-being and incidence of stroke in older adults. Psychosom Med 2001;63:210–215.
Diener E, Biswas-Diener R. Happiness: Unlocking the mysteries of psychological wealth. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.
Frederickson BL, Levenson RW. Positive emotions speed recovery from the cardiovascular sequelae of negative emotions. Cognition and Emotion 1998;12:191–220.
Tov W, Diener E. The well-being of nations: Linking together trust, cooperation, and democracy. In: BA Sullivan, M Snyder, JL Sullivan (Eds.) Cooperation: The psychology of effective human interaction. Malden, M.A.: Blackwell Publishing; 2008:323–342.
Diener E, Lucas RE. Personality and subjective well-being. In: D. Kahneman, E. Diener, and N. Schwartz (eds.). Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2003:213–229.
Steel P, Schmidt J, Schultz, J. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin2008;134(1):138–161.
Bradburn NM. The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine; 1969.
Diener E, Emmons RA. The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984;47:1105–1117.
Ryff CD, Love GD, Urry LH, et al. Psychological well-being and ill-being: do they have distinct or mirrored biological correlates? Psychother Psychosom 2006;75:85–95.
Costa PT, McCrae RR. Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980;38:668–678.
Schimmack U. The structure of subjective well-being. In: M Eid, RJ Larsen (eds). The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
Seligman ME. Authentic happiness. New York, NY: Free Press; 2002.
Frederickson, B.L. Positivity. New York: Crown Publishing; 2009.
Tellegen A, Lykken DT, Bouchard TJ, Wilcox KJ, Segal NL, Stephen R. Personality similarity in twins reared apart and together. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988;54(6):1031–1039.
Herrman HS, Saxena S, Moodie R. Promoting Mental Health: Concepts, Emerging Evidence, Practice. A WHO Report in collaboration with the Victoria Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
Barry MM, Jenkins R. Implementing Mental Health Promotion. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier. 2007
Lykken D, Tellegen A. Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychol Sci 1996;7:186–189.
Diener E, Lucas RE, Scollon CN. Beyond the hedonic treadmill: revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist 2006;61(4):305–314.
World Health Organization. 1949. WHO Constitution. Retrieved February 12, 2008
Breslow, L. Health measurement in the third era of public health. American Journal of Public Health 2006;96:17–19.
Green L., Kreuter M. “Health Promotion as a Public Health Strategy for the 1990s”. Annual Review of Public Health 1990;11:313–334).
Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social indicators of well-being. NewYork: Plenum Press; 1976:63–106.
Diener E. Subjective well-being: the science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist 2000;55(1):34–43.
Ryff CD, Keyes CLM. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995;69(4):719–727.
Diener E, Suh E, Oishi S. Recent findings on subjective well-being. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology 1997;24:25–41.
Veenhoven R. Sociological theories of subjective well-being. In: M Eid , RJ Larsen (eds). The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:44–61.
Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper Perennial; 1991.
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas R, Smith H. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin 1999;125:276–302.
Larsen RJ, Eid M. Ed Diener and The Science of Subjective Well-Being. In: RJ Larsen and M Eid, (Eds.) The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: Guildford Press, 2008:1–12.
Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA. A survey method for characterizing daily life: the day reconstruction method. Science 2004;306:1776–1780.
Eid M. Measuring the Immeasurable: Psychometric modeling of subjective well-being data. In: Eid M, Larsen RJ (eds.) The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:141–167.
Dupuy HJ (1978). Self-representations of general psychological well-being of American adults. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association Meeting, Los Angeles, October 1978.
Fazio, A.F. (1977). A concurrent validation study of the NCHS General Well-Being Schedule. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Center for Health Statistics, 1977. Vital and Health Statistics Series 2, No. 73. DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 78-1347.
Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The quality of well-being scale: Rationale for a single quality of life index. In: SR Walker, R Rosser (Eds.) Quality of Life: Assessment and Application. London: MTP Press; 1988:51–77.
Keyes CLM. The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. J Health Soc Res 2002;43(6):207-222.
Strine TW, Chapman DP, Balluz LS, Mokdad AH. Health-related quality of life and health behaviors by social and emotional support: Their relevance to psychiatry and medicine. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2008;43(2):151–159.
Strine TW, Chapman DP, Balluz LS, Moriarty DG, Mokdad AH. The associations between life satisfaction and health-related quality of life, chronic illness, and health behaviors among U.S. community-dwelling adults. Journal of Community Health 2008;33(1):40–50.
Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen J, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Personality Assessment 1985;49:71–75.
Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. J of Counseling Psychology 2006;53(1):80–93.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 2000;11:227–268.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of a brief measure of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J of Personality and Social Psychology 1988;54(6):1063–70.
Wheeler et al, Employment, sense of well-being and use of professional services among women. Am J Public Health 1983;73:908–911.
Hanmer, et al. Report of nationally representative values for the noninstitutionalized US adult population for 7 health-related quality of life scores. Med Decision Making 2006;26:391–400.
Kobau R, Sniezek J, Zack MM, Lucas RE, Burns A. Well-being assessment: an evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among U.S. adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being 2010;
Kahneman D, Deaton A. High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, DOI/10.1073/pnas.1011492107.
King LA. Interventions for enhancing subjective well-being: can we make people happier and should we? In: M Eid, RJ Larsen, (eds.) The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008:431–448.
Ness RB, Roysamb E, Tambs K, Harris JR, Reichborn-Kjennerud T. Subjective well-being: genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychol Med 2006;36:1033–1042.
Schnittker J. Happiness and success: genes, families, and the psychological effects of socioeconomic position and social support. Am J Sociol 2008;114:S233–S259.
Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E. Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological Science 2004;15:8–13.
Lucas RE, Clark AE, Georgellis Y, Diener E. Reexamining adaptation and the set-point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003;84:527–539.
Diener E, Oishi S,and Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology 2003;54:403–425.
Inglehart R. Gender, aging, and subjective well-being. Intl J Comp Sociol 2002;43(3-5):391–408.
Stevenson B, and Wolfers J. The paradox of declining female happiness. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 14969; 2009.
External
Argyle, M. Causes and correlates of happiness. In: D Kahneman, E Diener, N Schwarz (Eds.) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 1999:307–322:353–373.
Biswas-Diener RM. Material wealth and subjective well-being. In: M Eid, RJ Larsen (eds). The science of subjective well-being. New York: Guilford Press; 2008:307–322.
Warr P. Well-being in the workplace. In: D Kahneman , E Diener, N Schwarz (eds.) Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications; 2003:392–412.
Myers DG. Close relationships and quality of life. In: D Kahneman, E Diener, N Schwarz. (eds.) Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications; 2003:374–391.
Diener E, Suh EM. National differences in subjective well-being. In: D Kahneman, E Diener, N Schwarz. (eds.) Well-Being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications; 2003:434–450.
Helliwell JF, Huang H. How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being. British Journal of Political Science 2008;38:595–619.
Hird S. What is well-being? A brief review of current literature and concepts. NHS Scotland; 2003.
Bann, C.M., Kobau, R., Lewis, M.A., Zack, M.M., Luncheon, C., and Thompson, W.W. Development and psychometric evaluation of the public health surveillance well-being scale. Qual Life Res. 2012; 21(6), 1031-1043.
Barile JP, Reeve B, Smith AW, Zack MM, Mitchell SA, Kobau R, Cella D, Luncheon C, & Thompson WW. Monitoring population health for Healthy People 2020: Evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® Global Health, CDC Healthy Days, and Satisfaction with Life instruments. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:1201-1211.
Kobau R, Bann C, Lewis M, Zack MM, Boardman AM, Boyd R, Lim KC, Holder T, Hoff AKL, Luncheon C, Thompson W, Horner-Johnson W, Lucas RE. Mental, social, and physical well-being in New Hampshire, Oregon, and Washington: Implications for public health research and practice, 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Popul Health Metr 2013; 11(1)

Tanvir Ahmed Speaks

Saturday, 26 June 2021